Brian TheoryApplied AI & R&DRequest a fit call ↗
Explore the siteWorkServicesEngagementsAboutCVInsights
Selected work/Project H1

Research software & systems integration

NASA Ames Thermophysics Software

Software across technical boundaries.

From December 2022 through September 2025, Brian worked as Software Engineering Lead supporting NASA Ames through Amentum. His work connected private document analysis, numerical software, controls, instrumentation and data-acquisition integration with documentation and technical review.

Public role account · Three detailed project records

Intentionally abstract: the diagram teaches the engineering boundaries without disclosing operational systems or facilities.
2022–25software and integration work via AmentumLocalLLM, NLP and retrieval workflowsPLCscontrols and high-speed data-acquisition interfacesReviewdocumentation and readiness support
Role

Software Engineering Lead supporting NASA Ames through Amentum, 2022–2025.

Deliverable

Local-AI analysis, numerical software and controls, instrumentation and data-acquisition interfaces.

Result

Software, interface assumptions and review evidence were coordinated toward technical-review readiness.

Evidence

Three public-safe project accounts, a public CV role record and institutional context.

01 / The difficult question

How do you review software spanning documents, computation and hardware?

Thermophysics research software sits between disciplines. Information must move from technical documents into analysis, from numerical models into operational interfaces and from software into controls, instrumentation and data acquisition.

The engineering question was how to make those boundaries explicit enough for integration, documentation and technical review without losing the pace required by research work.

02 / Brian's contribution

Connect analysis, numerical software and integration evidence.

Brian developed AI-assisted document-analysis, information-extraction and knowledge-management workflows using local language models, NLP and retrieval. He built numerical software and communications infrastructure connecting PLCs, controls, instrumentation and high-speed data acquisition.

He coordinated software and hardware integration, documentation and technical reviews supporting Critical Design Review and System Integration Review readiness.

03 / How the system works

01Technical sources

Organize documents, requirements and research context.

02Analysis & models

Extract information and implement numerical software.

03Integration

Connect communications, controls and instrumentation.

04Review evidence

Document interfaces, decisions and readiness.

The visual remains intentionally abstract: it explains the engineering boundaries without naming facilities, systems, interfaces or operational performance.

04 / Interface discipline

The handoff is part of the software.

Research code becomes a systems problem when values, timing, ownership and failure behavior cross between software and hardware. Integration work therefore included communications infrastructure, documentation and technical coordination—not only application code.

AI-assisted document work used local models and retrieval in support of analysis and knowledge management. This page does not disclose source documents, prompts, model artifacts or internal operational content.

Review readiness

Trace evidence across technical interfaces.

Abstracted
The matrix expresses a review discipline only. It deliberately omits system names, facility details, performance values and internal artifacts.
05

Deliverables across technical boundaries

Local-AI workflows, numerical software, controls interfaces, integration documentation and review evidence were coordinated across a mixed research environment.

06

Document the handoffs while building

Review readiness is strongest when interface assumptions, data movement and failure states are recorded during implementation—not reconstructed at the end.

Scope & limitations

Public role account with institutional boundaries.

The linked project accounts add approved technical detail while omitting facility names, unnecessary internal system names, unsupported performance figures, operational details, internal documents and screenshots.

This was work supporting NASA Ames via Amentum. The page does not imply NASA or Amentum endorsement of Brian Theory, this consulting site or any present service offering.

Inspect the evidence

Public role record and institutional context—nothing operational.

Useful when

Your R&D team must connect research, numerical methods, hardware interfaces and review evidence across disciplinary boundaries.

Explore fractional R&D direction →
← Previous: All selected workNext: All selected work →